AI adversarial bench trial
Test your case before you try it.
Two AI attorneys argue your case from opposite sides and an AI judge weighs them, so you can see where it holds before you commit a client to it.
Quick mode · Round 2 of 3● Streaming
60-second demo · Quick mode running liveVideo placeholder
How it works
Two sides argued independently. One bench weighing them.
I.
Plaintiff AI
Builds and argues the strongest case for the plaintiff from your facts and evidence.
II.
Defense AI
Argues the defense on its own, without seeing the plaintiff’s strategy in advance.
III.
AI judge
Weighs both sides round by round and explains the reasoning behind each assessment.
What you get · illustrativeFull mode
Plaintiff win probability
58%
Defense win probability
42%
Settlement Pressure Index
7.2 / 10
Round-by-round transcript
Round 1 · Opening positionsView
Round 2 · Counter-argumentsView
Round 3 · Evidence challengesView
Quick mode
3 rounds · about 2 minutes
Runs live in front of a client, so you can walk through the strengths and risks together.
Full mode
7 rounds · about 5 minutes
Adds counter-arguments, evidence challenges, motions and a verdict assessment.
Decision support, not legal advice. Below about 40% confidence, probabilities are directional only; 66% and above is reasonably reliable.
Trust & limitations →Use cases
Pressure-test a case whenever it changes.
A mock jury costs five figures and takes weeks to organize. A Quick mode run takes about two minutes, so you can test the case again each time something changes.
Settlement strategy
See how much pressure each side is under before you negotiate.
Client expectations
Run Quick mode with the client and talk through the risks.
Trial prep
Find the arguments and evidence challenges the other side is likely to raise.
Re-score as discovery develops
Run the same case again as new facts come in and compare the results.
Citation verification
Every citation checked before you rely on it.
Each citation in a report is checked against CourtListener and a curated statute library, then marked Verified or Unverified. That way a fabricated AI citation doesn’t end up in something you file.
Verified means the citation matched a real authority. It does not mean the authority supports the proposition. You confirm that before anything reaches a court.
Smith v. Jones (Cal. Ct. App. 20XX)
Cited in Round 2 · Plaintiff
Cal. Civ. Code § XXXX
Cited in Round 3 · Defense
Doe v. Roe Holdings (20XX)
Cited in Round 4 · Plaintiff
Cal. Evid. Code § XXXX
Cited in Round 5 · Judge
Placeholder citations for layout
Sample report
See what a finished report looks like.
A redacted example of a Full mode report: probabilities, confidence, Settlement Pressure Index, the full transcript and the citation check.
Sandbox run · not advice on a live matter
[Redacted] v. [Redacted]
Placeholder · redacted report image to be supplied
Setup
From intake to first run in minutes.
Case classification & venue
Security & confidentiality
Where your data goes
[Final wording pending: hosting location and subprocessors.]
Retention
[Final wording pending: how long case materials are kept and how to delete them.]
No training on client data
[Final wording pending: client data is not used to train AI models.]
Decision-support software. Not legal advice.© 2026 [Legal entity name]